Embedded Files
See also
See also
Also see subpages of this section (use menu).
Resources
Resources
Claim CD001: Radiometric dating falsely assumes rocks are closed systems
Claim CD002: Radiometric dating falsely assumes initial conditions are known
Claim CD004: Cosmic rays and free neutrinos affect U and Ar decay rates
Claim CD010: Radiometric dating gives unreliable results
Claim CD020: Consistency of radiometric dating comes from selective reporting
Claim CD031: KBS Tuff shows the flaws of radiometric dating
Claim CF210: Radiometric dating falsely assumes that rates are constant
Brief responses in the Index to Creationist Claims in the TalkOrigins Archive.
Radiometric Dating and the Geological Time Scale: Circular Reasoning or Reliable Tools?
Article by Andrew MacRae in the TalkOrigins Archive.
Video in the How Creationism Taught Me Real Science series.
Refuting “Radiometric Dating Methods Makes Untenable Assumptions!”
Brief article by Emil Karlsson on the Debunking Denialism website.
Smoking Gun Evidence of an Ancient Earth: GPS Data Confirms Radiometric Dating
Post by R. Joel Duff on his Naturalis Historia blog, looking at how GPS data and radiometric data are in accordance with each other.
Nuclear Chemistry and Medicine: Why “Young Earthers” Cannot Have It Both Ways
In-depth article by Amanda J. Nichols and Myron A. Penner in the journal Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith. The complete issue in which this appears is also available.
Woodmorappe's Collection of Bad Dates
Part of a longer article covering multiple topics by Dave E. Matson in the TalkOrigins Archive.
Creationism and Accelerated Decay
Article by Matthew Rognstad, written under the supervision of Prof. Timothy H. Heaton and hosted by the University of South Dakota.
"RATE" Leaders Abandon Geologic Fantasies and Admit that Extensive Radioactive Decay has Occurred
Article by Kevin R. Henke on the Old Earth Ministries website.
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse