Claim CI100: Design is detectable
Claim CI100.1: Look; is design not obvious?
Claim CI101: Complexity indicates design
Claim CI102: Irreducible complexity indicates design
Claim CI110: Complex specified information indicates design
Claim CI111: Dembski's filter can detect design
Claim CI111.1: Specified information criterion produces no false positives
Claim CI111.2: Specified complexity characterizes what intelligent agents do
Claim CI113: Genetic algorithms require a designer to specify desired outcome
Claim CI120: Purpose indicates design
Claim CI130: Functional integration indicates design
Claim CI131: Every machine's origin, where determinable, is by intelligent agency
Claim CI141: Similarities in DNA and anatomy are due to common design
Claim CI141.1: Similar structures for similar functions, different for different
Claim CI190: SETI researchers expect that they can detect design
Claim CI191: Archaeologists and forensic scientists can detect design
Claim CI401: The methodology of science rules out even considering design
Claim CI402: Evolutionists have blinded themselves to seeing design
Claim CI410: Design requires a designer
Brief responses in the Index to Creationist Claims in the TalkOrigins Archive.
Geisler: A Scientific Basis for Creation: The Principle of Uniformity (PDF format)
Thwaites: An Answer to Dr. Geisler -- From the Perspective of Biology (PDF format)
Edwords: An Answer to Dr. Geisler -- From the Perspective of Philosophy (PDF format)
Geisler: Uniformity and Creation:A Response to Edwords and Thwaites. (PDF format)
Edwords: Apples and Oranges: A Response to Geisler. (PDF format)
Geisler: What Mount Rushmore and DNA Have in Common (PDF format)
Edwords: The Mystery Behind the Mystery (PDF format)
A debate between creationist Norman L. Geisler and evolutionists William M. Thwaites and Frederick Edwords in the journal Creation/Evolution on the website of the National Center for Science Education. The references are missing from these but the full issues in which the articles appear are available through the links labelled 'PDF format'.
A Creationist Rejects Intelligent Design, Appeals to “Natural Processes” to Explain Stone Artifacts
Post by Joel Duff on his Naturalis Historia blog.