Note: The resources covering this book took on the form of a sort of conversation between various evolutionists and creationists in a series of blog posts and articles responding to one another, unlike the resources reviewing other creationist books. I believe I have listed them below in chronological order so they make the most sense when read one by one, working downwards.
A Biochemist’s Crusade to Overturn Evolution Misrepresents Theory and Ignores Evidence
Book review of Michael Behe's Darwin Devolves in Science by Nathan H. Lents, S. Joshua Swamidas, and Richard E. Lenski.
Scientists Damn Behe’s New Book; He Responds Lamely
Post by Jerry Coyne on his Why Evolution is True blog.
Darwin Devolves: Behe gets polar bear evolution very wrong
Post by Jerry Coyne on his Why Evolution is True blog.
Does Behe’s “First Rule” Really Show that Evolutionary Biology Has a Big Problem?
Post by Richard Lenski on his Telliamed Revisited blog.
Post by Jerry Coyne on his Why Evolution is True blog.
Darwin Devolves: “Devolution” is not a thing
Post by Nathan H Lents on his Human Evolution blog.
On the Evolution of Citrate Use
Post by Richard Lenski on his Telliamed Revisited blog.
On Damaged Genes and Polar Bears
Post by Richard Lenski on his Telliamed Revisited blog.
Rich Lenski Continues His Demolition of Michael Behe’s New Book
Post by Jerry Coyne on his Why Evolution is True blog.
Evolution Goes Viral! (And how real science works)
Post by Richard Lenski on his Telliamed Revisited blog.
Behe and His Publisher Distort His Reviews, Pretend That They Praise His Work
Post by Jerry Coyne on his Why Evolution is True blog.
Review by Gregory I. Lang and Amber M. Rice of Michael Behe's Darwin Devolves in the journal Evolution.