Embedded Files
See also
See also
'Creationism', use of the term
Resources
Resources
Claim CH001: Creationism has explanatory power
Claim CI001: Intelligent design theory is scientific
Claim CI001.1: Intelligent design theory is not religious
Claim CI001.2: Intelligent design is not creationism
Claim CI001.3: Intelligent design is mainstream
Claim CI001.4: Intelligent design has been published in peer-reviewed journals
Claim CI002: Intelligent design has explanatory power
Claim CI009: Evidence for design disproves evolutionary mechanisms
Claim CI010: There is a law of conservation of information
Brief responses in the Index to Creationist Claims in the TalkOrigins Archive.
Why Scientific Creationism Fails to Meet the Criteria of Science
Article by Ralph W Lewis in the journal Creation/Evolution on the website of the National Center for Science Education. The full issue in which this article originally appeared is available in PDF format.
Astrology is scientific theory, courtroom told
Article by Celeste Biever in New Scientist. ('Astrology would be considered a scientific theory if judged by the same criteria used by a well-known advocate of Intelligent Design to justify his claim that ID is science, a landmark US trial heard on Tuesday.')
Evidence of the Quality of Creation Science Research
Article by Frank Awbrey in the journal Creation/Evolution on the website of the National Center for Science Education. The full issue in which this article appears is available in PDF format.
A Survey of Creationist Field Research
Article by Henry P Zuidema in the journal Creation/Evolution on the website of the National Center for Science Education. The full issue in which this article appears is available in PDF format.
Scientific Creationism and Error
Article by Robert Schadewald in the journal Creation/Evolution on the website of the National Center for Science Education. The references are missing from this version but are available in the PDF format of the issue in which this article appears.
But Some of Them Are Scientists, Aren't They?
Article by Ronald H. Pine in the journal Creation/Evolution on the website of the National Center for Science Education. The bibliography is missing from this version but is available in the PDF format of the issue in which this article appears.
Old-Time Religion and the New Physics
Article by Robert M. Price in the journal Creation/Evolution on the website of the National Center for Science Education. The bibliography is missing from this version but is available in the PDF format of the issue in which this article appears.
Scientific Creationism and the Science of Creative Intelligence
Article by Robert M Price in the journal Creation/Evolution on the website of the National Center for Science Education. This discusses how creationism/Intelligent Design dresses up religion in the guise of science in order to gain a foothold in schools and compares it with a precedent involving Marharishi Mahesh Yogi's transcendental mediation. Footnotes and the bibliography are missing but are available in the PDF format of the issue in which this article appears.
Young Earth Creationism and the Failure of the “Framework” Defense
Article by Emil Karlsson on the Debunking Denialism website about creationist criticisms of evolutionsts' interpretative frameworks.
Genesis Knows Nothing of Scientific Creationism
Article by Conrad Hyers in the journal Creation/Evolution on the website of the National Center for Science Education. The bibliography is missing from this version but is available in the PDF format of the issue in which this article appears. This fits better on this site in the section Creationism and the Bible but I have also included it here, as it does deal with creationism as science as well.
The Big Tent and the Camel's Nose
Article by Eugenie C. Scott on the website of the National Center for Science Education, looking at the lack of testable models in the Intelligent Design movement, which instead presents a 'sterile anti-evolutionism'.
Reflections on a Young Earth Creationist’ Approach to Scientific Apologetics
Post by R. Joel Duff on his Naturalis Historia blog, exploring some Young-Earth Creationist approaches such as casting doubt without proposing sound alternatives, presuppositional apologetics, and circular use of evidence.
Article by Howard J. Van Till in Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith. The issue in which this appears is also available in PDF format (p. 14 of the file).
Creationists use miracles to explain why their predictions fail
Post by Adam Benton on his Filthy Monkey Men blog, covering one example of creationists using the 'escape hatch' of waving away problems by invoking supernatural intervention.
Why Creationism Should Not be Taught as Science: Part 1: The Legal Issues
Why Creationism Should Not Be Taught As Science: Part 2: The Educational Issues
Articles by Frederick Edwords for the journal Creation/Evolution on the website of the National Center for Science Education. The bibliographies are not showing but PDF versions of the full issues in which these articles appear are available: Part 1, Part 2.
Biological design in science classrooms
Special report by Eugenie C. Scott and Nicholas J. Matzke in PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America).
Paper by R. Joel Duff, Thomas R. Beatman, and David S. MacMillan III in the journal Evolution: Education and Outreach. Deals with creationist manipulation and misuse of science.
The Dangers of Poor Scholarship: A Creationist’s Take on Feathered Dinosaurs
Post by biologist R. Joel Duff on his Naturalis Historia blog.
The Evolution of Creation Science, Part 1: Vestigial Structures and Biological Degeneration
The Evolution of Creation Science, Part 2: Beneficial Mutations
The Evolution of Creation Science, Part 3: Natural Selection and Convergent Evolution
Three articles by Philip J. Senter and Jared J. Mackey in the journal Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith. Reviews the creation science literature on several topics, looking at the misuse of scientific terms, misrepresentation of mainstream science and scientific findings, and self-contradictory claims. The full issues in which these articles appear are also available: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3.
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse